Behind The Scenes

Matt Brewing Company, 150 Years and Counting

To celebrate our exhibition Beer Here: Brewing New York’s History, the New-York Historical Society is hosting a series of Saturday beer tastings run by local breweries in the exhibit’s Beer Hall. The program will run from May 26 through August 25; half-hour tastings will start at 2pm and 4pm. Not only will visitors get to taste some of these local creations, but there will be hops, whole leaf flowers and other beer ingredients for people to touch, smell and experience. Tickets are $35 unless otherwise noted.

Matt Brewing Company, like many New York breweries during prohibition, was forced to adapt or die. During prohibition the brewery began making soft drinks, including the popular Utica Club Ginger Ale and non-alcoholic malt tonics. However, they never forgot their history as a brewery, and found a sneaky way to keep their customers drinking. On the malt tonic label, the brewery advised, “Caution: Do not ferment, do not add yeast, or you will create beer.”

Fortunately, Matt didn’t have to spend too long relying on his customers to make beer for him. A strong supporter of the repeal of prohibition, Matt was actually in Washington D.C. the day it was repealed, and got one of the first brewing licenses after the repeal. “We sold first legal beer in country after prohibition,” said Matt Brewing Co. spokeswoman Meghan Fraser, and they’ve been brewing ever since. “After prohibition it was just yellow beers. People just wanted to drink, and then people got sophisticated.” So Matt began producing Saranac, a “distinctive but drinkable” brew.

Matt Brewing Company is still run by the Matt family today, almost 150 years after F.X. Matt came to America from Germany and began brewing. But the company has expanded to include some new brews, such as their High Peak series, including an imperial stout, and a new white IPA hybrid that will be available at their New-York Historical Society tastings. Fraser says, “it’s great that we’ve been here for so long, but we want to innovate and keep things new.”

Saranac will be hosting a tasting at the beer hall in Beer Here: Brewing New York’s History on May 26 at 2pm and 4pm.

 

Post to Twitter


No Comments

“I’m Running This Train!”: Mayor McClellan And The First Subway Ride

Controller handle

Controller handle, 1904, Silver, steel, ebony, New-York Historical Society, Gift of George B. McClellan, 1922.103

Imagine you’re charged with taking a subway for a ride. Now imagine that subway was the first subway ever. A pretty daunting task! Mayor George B. McClellan had the honor of operating the first NYC subway train on October 27, 1904, and was pretty excited about it!

The IRT had just opened, and McClellan was supposed to start the train from the City Hall Station. After that, he was to hand the controls to the IRT motorman. However, he was having so much fun that he refused to give up the controls, and steered the train all the way to the 103rd Street station in Harlem! From the New York Times, October 28, 1904:

“Are we ready?” asked the Mayor.

“All right,” responded [IRT general manager] Mr. Hedley, who kept his hand on the emergency brake lever. “Slow at first, remember!”

The Mayor’s wrist shot out about an inch, and the train began to move at 2:35:30 o’clock. Slowly it rounded the loop and entered the big Brooklyn Bridge Station, but just as it emerged toward Elm Street there was a violent jolt, a sudden stop, and the passengers were thrown forward as though the train had struck an obstruction.

“What’s up?” asked the Mayor.

“It’s all right,” cried Mr. Hedley, “turn it the other way.”

The train shot forward over a switch to the express tracks, and was passing through the Worth Street Station before those who were watching the motorman became aware that the sudden stop had been due to the emergency brake. The silver controller’s bad fit caused it to come in contact with the brake lever when the Mayor turned it too far to the left, and Mr. Hedley had made a quick readjustment to prevent a recurrence of the jolt.

“Shall I slow her down here?” inquired the Mayor-Motorman as the curve into the Spring Street Station came in sight.

“You’re going slow enough,” was the reply, “but aren’t you tired of it? Don’t you want the motorman to take hold?”

“I’m Running This Train!”

“No, Sir! I’m running this train!”

The Mayor said later that his knowledge of automobiling had helped him to “catch on” in a hurry. As the train flew past the down-town stations his confidence grew. Mr. Hedley never let go the brake control, and Vice President Bryan stood behind the motorman, but it looked as though the Mayor was well able to take care of things alone.

Eventually the Mayor relinquished the controller, and the train made it from City Hall Station to 146th Street in twenty-six minutes flat! Unfortunately, workmen were also quick to start placing ads in the subway stations. “It was noticed when the train had come down as far as Forty-second Street that workmen were beginning to place big framed advertisements along the floors of each station. . . .The car advertisements have been in place for some time, but until then the stations had depended upon their beautiful mural ornamentation for decoration. Everybody in the train was expressing regret that the fine appearance of things was to be marred.”

The New-York Historical Society was gifted the silver controller of the first train by Mayor McClellan. It is inscribed with “Controller used by the Hon. George B. McClellan, Mayor of the City of New York, in starting the first train on the Rapid Transit Railroad from the City Hall station, New York, Thursday, Oct. 27, 1904. Presented to the Hon. George B. McClellan by August Belmont, President of the Interborough Rapid Transit Company.”

 

The silver controller is currently on view in Stories in Sterling: Four Centuries of Silver in New York, open through September 23, 2012.

Post to Twitter


3 Comments

The Horror of Smallpox! Disease and Film Noir

Diamond smuggling! Disease! Murder! These and more are the subject of the 1950 film noir The Killer That Stalked New York. The film follows Shelia Bennet, one of a diamond-smuggling couple who contracts the deadly disease in Cuba, and brings it to the city, slowly infecting everyone she encounters. Smallpox cases start popping up around the city, inducing mass panic when the city runs out of serum for it’s mandatory vaccinations. Eventually, Bennet gives herself up, telling the authorities who she has come in contact with.

The film is based on the real-life story of the 1947 smallpox scare in New York City. An American businessman returning from Mexico was the first to die from the disease, though he was misdiagnosed as having bronchitis. Two others were diagnosed as having smallpox soon after, and all who came in contact with them were required to be vaccinated.

The New York City Health Commissioner recommended vaccination to all New Yorkers, and the city provided vaccines for free across the city. Through propaganda and public education the program became incredibly effective, all without encroaching on personal civil liberties, which wouldn’t have been the case had the city instituted mandatory vaccination. Over six million New Yorkers were immunized within a few weeks; according to CNN, “Doctors immunized residents at a rate of eight injections per minute  500,000 in one day. The feared smallpox epidemic was averted.” The last naturally-occurring case of smallpox was in 1977.

Learn about the history of vaccination and more in BE SURE! BE SAFE! GET VACCINATED! Smallpox, Vaccination and Civil Liberties in New York, open May 15.

Post to Twitter


2 Comments

Beauty in Strength: The Athlete of the Marié Miniatures

Fernand Paillet, Edith Hope Goddard (1868-1970), 1891, Watercolor on ivory, Gift of the estate of Peter Marié, 1905.119

It’s easy to assume the women of high society in the Gilded Age did nothing more than sip champagne and attend parties with the rest of Mrs. Astor’s 400. But not every woman who counted herself among New York’s elite was content to just sit back and enjoy the party. Edith Hope Goddard was one woman who wouldn’t let her social status define her.

Goddard was an avid sailor and golfer, once defeating Russian Grand Duke Michael in a 1900 golf  tournament. But her main claim to fame came in 1895, when she became the first woman to ever sail as a crew member to compete for America’s Cup. At the 1895 America’s Cup competition, she sailed as a crew member on the Defender, one year after she married banker and yachting enthusiast Charles Oliver Iselin.

According to the America’s Cup recordsMen and Women of the Outdoor World magazine reported: “[Iselin's] second wife is an enthusiastic yachtswoman and her counsel and presence during a race are patent factors in his achievements. She is charming and demure, sports white gowns and natty sailor suits and is as hospitable and popular as she is attractive“! Goddard competed for America’s Cup again in 1899 and 1903, the latter just after the birth of her son.

The miniature Peter Marié commissioned of Goddard was painted four years before her first America’s Cup win, when she was just 23 years old. Her lacy gown and hair in curls makes it easy to mistake her for a demure and quiet young woman. But her delicate looks just prove that looks aren’t everything.

Goddard’s miniature and more are on display through July 8 in Beauties of the Gilded Age: Peter Marié’s Miniatures of Society Women. You can also learn more about women in sports on The Bill Shannon Biographical Dictionary of New York Sports.

Post to Twitter


1 Comment

Honoring the Titanic, 100 Years Later

Medal, ca. 1912, Bronze, Gift of the Naval History Society, 1925, 2008.42.349

Medal, ca. 1912, Bronze, Gift of the Naval History Society, 1925, 2008.42.349

Nearly 100 years ago, the RMS Titanic sank in the Atlantic after striking an iceberg. Over 1,500 died, and the event continues to serve as a cautionary tale of the dangers of overconfidence. There were many who risked their lives to save those on the sinking Titanic, including Sir Arthur Henry Rostron. Rostron was the  master of the ocean liner RMS Carpathia, which was also in the North Atlantic when it received a distress call from the Titanic.

Rostron was awoken by his wireless operator, and sprung into action, directing the Carpathia toward the sinking ship and navigating through dangerous ice. The Carpathia picked up 712 survivors from the water and the Titanic‘s life boats. Rostron was awarded the Congressional Gold Medal “For the heroic rescue of the survivors of the Titanic/ Lost in Mid-Atlantic.”

The above bronze medal also commemorates Rostron’s action on the night of the Titanic‘s sinking, and will be on display in the DiMenna Children’s History Museum, along with other items from our collection in Titanic Voices. Items include a portrait of a couple who perished in the crash, and an eyewitness account of the ship’s sinking. The Children’s Museum will also host a reading of Titanic Sinks! with author Barry Denenberg on April 15.

 

Post to Twitter


1 Comment

The Invisible Line Between White and Black

What defines race? Is it color? Is it DNA? Is it the labels you choose for yourself? In The Invisible Line: Three American Families and the Secret Journey from Black to White, author Daniel J. Sharfstein argues that it is becoming ever harder to view race neatly in black and white. He does so by looking at post-Civil War America, through three black families, two who chose to “pass” as white and one who moved north and suffered the hostile attitudes of surrounding whites. We spoke with Sharfstein about his research, his book, and why this conversation is more relevant than ever.

Sharfstein will be discussing these issues and more with Brent Staples in their upcoming conversation The Invisible Line: Three American Families and the Secret Journey from Black to White, on April 12.

What was the inspiration behind this book?

This book was the product of years of research, and a lot of choices. I’m telling the history of race in the United States through three families who relate in a singular way; People who started as “people of color” and wound up “white” over generations. The process of recovering these stories, why I specifically chose these three families, the issues and experiences that made me think it could be told through these families, these are all things that are not in the book but that I’m looking forward to talking about.

A large part of this story was recovering these family histories, and I think it’s important to understand the issue of moving from family history to larger histories. To move beyond the bare census data to telling a fully fleshed out narrative of people who lived 100, 200 years ago, and relating those family stories to big issues in American history.

How do the narratives of these families relate to current events?

There is absolutely room for current events. The book begins and ends with conversations I’ve had with living descendents of these families. in a way the book is designed to start conversations about what race means today, what kind of continuties there are with the past and how our feelings of race have changed over time.

How common was “passing” in post-Civil War America?

I spent a solid year just looking for as many families who experienced this kind of narrative as I could find, and I found a lot of them. In all kinds of histories of the American south, you find stories about families who crossed the color line in memoirs and court cases. For as long as America has had laws that distinguish blacks from whites, there have been people litigating their racial classification. Until the 1980s there were dozens of cases where juries had to determine whether people are white or black. There has been a revolution in the amount of historical and genealogical material available and searchable on the Internet, more people are learning that this is their story and more people are now posting about it in public forums, so we actually are at a point where we know more about this phenomenon than we ever have, and I think it’s time for us to think about what is means.

How did you research the book?

For the book I was doing the same kind of genealogical research that you would do, spendings hours on Ancestry.com with everyone else, so in a way this is an attempt to see what these kinds of sources can really tell us. It’s not just that we can learn when our great grandparents were born and died and where they lived, we are in a position to really begin to tell some fully fleshed out stories about what their lives were like and what they were like as people.


Post to Twitter


1 Comment

The Pistol That Killed A Founding Father

John Trumbull, Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804), After 1804, Oil on canvas, X.164

On July 11, 1804,  Alexander Hamilton, Secretary of the Treasury and Aaron Burr, Vice President, rowed to Weehawken, NJ to participate in a duel. Longstanding bad blood between the two men—fueled by Burr’s taking a senate seat over Hamilton’s father-in-law and Hamilton’s defamation of Burr during the 1804 gubernatorial race—finally boiled over, and Hamilton agreed to a duel at Burr’s suggestion. There was just one problem: dueling was illegal.

The men agreed to duel in New Jersey, where the dueling laws weren’t as harshly enforced, but the act of dueling was still outlawed. That’s why, according to Ron Chernow in Alexander Hamilton, the Wogdon pistols were transported in a portmanteau so that no parties could claim that they had seen them.

There are differing accounts of what happened at the duel. Some reports say Hamilton intentionally missed Burr. Others say he fired too soon. Andrew Burstein writes, “Hamilton brought the pistols, which had a larger barrel than regular dueling pistols, and a secret hair-trigger, and were therefore much more deadly. Hamilton gave himself an unfair advantage in their duel, and got the worst of it anyway.” Whatever happened with Hamilton’s gun, Burr’s worked the way he wanted, and Hamilton was fatally wounded, and died the next day after being transported back to Manhattan.

After being housed at Hamilton’s brother-in-law John Barker Church’s estate through the nineteenth century, the pistols were sold to JP Morgan & Chase in 1930. Through April 9 they will be on view at the Robert H. and Clarice Smith New York Gallery of American History. You can also view excerpts from some of Hamilton and Burr’s disagreements at the DiMenna Children’s History Museum.

Post to Twitter


No Comments

Who Was Toussaint Louverture?

Dominique Toussaint L'Ouverture (1743-1803)

Dominique Toussaint Louverture (1743-1803), after 1832, Watercolor on ivory, New-York Historical Society, Purchase, The Louis Durr Fund, 1956.123

“Brothers and friends, I am Toussaint Louverture; perhaps my name has made itself known to you. I have undertaken vengeance. I want Liberty and Equality to reign in St. Domingue. I am working to make that happen. Unite yourselves to us, brothers, and fight with us for the same cause.”

These words were spoken by Toussaint Louverture, known as the “George Washington of the Haitian Revolution,” on August 29, 1793 to Black Haitians at Camp Turel. And yes, by that point his name would have made itself known. Assisting the slave rebellion on Haiti since 1791, Louverture agreed to fight for the French against the Spanish in exchange for the abolition of slavery, inspired by the language of freedom and equality associated with the French Revolution. On February 4, 1794, the French revolutionary government proclaimed the abolition of slavery in Haiti, and Loverture allied with the French.

In 1801, Louverture issued a constitution for Saint-Domingue, which called for black autonomy and a sovereign black state. However, Louverture was very aware of France’s fear of black leadership in Haiti, and he was jailed after resisting General Charles Emmanuel Leclerc’s mission from Napoleon to diplomatically seize control of the island. Louverture died in jail in France, but warned his captors that the rebels in Haiti would still fight for their country: “In overthrowing me you have cut down in Saint Domingue only the trunk of the tree of liberty; it will spring up again from the roots, for they are many and they are deep.” He was right; leader Jean-Jacques Dessalines declared independence for Haiti on January 1, 1804, making it the only nation whose independence was gained as part of a slave rebellion.

Have you check out Revolution! The Atlantic World Reborn yet? Tell us, what does revolution mean to you?

Post to Twitter


No Comments

Can Tiny Stamps Trigger a Revolution?

Credit: Don Pollard / New-York Historical Society

by Timothy Wroten

On March 22, 1765, The British Parliament passed the Stamp Act, a direct tax imposed specifically on printed materials sold in the American colonies. News of the Stamp Act’s passage in 1765 ignited a firestorm from New Hampshire to Georgia (though apparently not in Britain’s Caribbean or Canadian domains).

No one in any time or place has warmly welcomed more taxes, but taxation is generally acknowledged as a necessary means for living within a governed society. Even founding father Benjamin Franklin once wrote, “In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.” So, why were colonists so upset about this particular tax?

The historians of our Revolution! exhibition note that by requiring official stamps on newspapers, legal documents, dice, and playing cards, The Stamp Act brought £100,000 into the British treasury every year. Half that amount, collected in the colonies, would help pay the cost of a 10,000-man British army stationed in the newly acquired territories of Quebec and Upper Canada.

In October 1765, New York City would host the Stamp Act Congress, where elected colonial representatives devised a unified petition against new British taxation. The tax burden was not the issue for American protestors. Such a direct tax and the provisions for its enforcement, they claimed, endangered the right of colonial assemblies to raise their own taxes; denied the right to trial by jury; weakened colonial presses by increasing newspaper prices; and drained already low supplies of precious coins.

While a Parliamentary repeal would eventually end the Stamp Act, colonists’ outrage over long-standing grievances did not, and the fundamental legitimacy of Parliamentary rule no longer appeared self-evident. See the original Stamp Act and find out more about the revolutionary transformations in the American colonies and beyond in Revolution! The Atlantic World Reborn.

Post to Twitter


1 Comment

Think Dirty Political Games Are New? Think Again

 

We don't want eleanor either

A white pinback campaign button from the 1944 election resulting in FDR's third term, from the anti-Roosevelt factions, printed in blue "We Don't Want Eleanor Either". (Pinback button, 1944, Gift of Bella C. Landauer, 2002.1.3754)

New York Magazine recently warned that the 2012 presidential election could be the “ most negative in the history of American politics.” Granted, negative messages have more ways of reaching the American public than ever, with internet and Television advertising. but negative campaigns are an unfortunate tradition of the American political scene.

The New-York Historical Society has a consdierable collection of campaign buttons and other material, though many of our negative campaign buttons are from the FDR elections. Opponent Wendell Willkie and anti-Roosevelt constituents came up with a slew of slogans designed to take down FDR in his (successful) attempt to be elected for a third term. Slogans like “Elect Willkie. Preserve Your Freedom. Be Thankful You Can Still Do It!“, “Roosevelt No More, Just Forget It”  and “Vote for Willkie if you want to vote again!” were found on pins and matchbooks. Pins took shots at family members (“We Don’t Want Eleanor Either“) and dramatically compared a third FDR term to a term for Hitler (“No Third Internationale, Third Reich, Third Term“).

Of course campaigns don’t always have to be dirty. This heart-shaped button shows that Clinton and Gore care, and this button urged Americans to continue with Lyndon B. Johnson. But while these buttons signify the candidate’s grace and respect for political discourse, the insulting slogans are just so much more fun.

Have any favorite slogans from campaigns past? Send them to us!

Post to Twitter


1 Comment